Cognitive Psychology · Consciousness Science
Jason Clarke, PhD · Cognitive Scientist

Constructing Experience

Attention, expectation, prediction, and the science of conscious perception.

How does the brain construct a conscious world from attention, expectation, and sensory evidence?

This site is for anyone who has ever wondered how the world becomes experience. It is for perception scientists and students, but also for children, artists, philosophers, and curious adults who have asked questions such as: Why do I see colour? How can I miss something right in front of me? How does the brain construct a world? What is consciousness? The essays, demonstrations, research summaries, and theoretical reflections collected here are invitations to look again at ordinary experience and find it extraordinary.

I am a cognitive scientist investigating how attention, expectation, prediction, and inference shape conscious experience. My research combines behavioural experiments, psychophysics, EEG/ERP-informed methods, predictive processing, and theoretical approaches to awareness and worldhood.

I am a Lecturer in Cognitive Psychology in the School of Human and Social Sciences at the University of West London. At UWL, I lead a research programme on attention, expectation, prediction, and conscious perception, working with my doctoral students on projects examining the interplay between attention and expectation in constructing experience, neural signatures of face perception, auditory and haptic expectation, visual acceleration, optic flow, visual gravity, and perceived duration.

Before joining UWL, I was a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at State University of New York, Farmingdale State College, and held teaching and research positions at The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, The New School for Social Research, William Paterson University, New York City College/CUNY, and the W.E.B. Du Bois Scholars Institute, hosted at Princeton University.

I completed my PhD in Cognitive Psychology at the New School for Social Research with Arien Mack, Marcel Kinsbourne, and William Hirst, where my work was shaped by traditions in attention, perception, neuropsychology, memory, and consciousness. I also completed an MA in Psychology at the New School for Social Research with Arien Mack, and a BA (Hons) in Ancient World Studies at University College London. At UCL, I studied ancient Greek philosophy in seminars with Dr Robert W. Sharples, reading and discussing figures including the Presocratics, Heraclitus, Parmenides, Democritus, Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus. Dr Sharples’s work in ancient philosophy, natural philosophy, and the Aristotelian tradition remains an important part of the intellectual background to my current theoretical interests.

My research asks how experience is constructed: when awareness depends on attention, how expectations shape perception, and whether expectations can sometimes generate reports of experience in the absence of a corresponding stimulus. I use behavioural, psychophysical, online, and EEG/ERP methods, and develop theoretical links with predictive processing, active inference, the Free Energy Principle, and Awareness-First Theory.

My research on attention, expectation, and conscious perception developed in part through my earlier work with Arien Mack and the Mack Perception Lab at The New School for Social Research, an important intellectual home for my work on inattentional blindness and the relationship between attention and perception. My current theoretical work also draws on my earlier formation in ancient philosophy, especially questions concerning the nature of reality, appearance, mind, matter, ontology, and the relation between what appears and what is.

My teaching spans sensation and perception, cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, statistics, and quantitative research methods. Across these areas, I aim to help students understand how mind, brain, behaviour, and experience can be studied scientifically, while also encouraging them to think deeply about perception, consciousness, and the construction of reality.

Childhood questions that became a research programme.

Some of the questions that now guide my research began long before I had the language of perception science, predictive processing, or consciousness studies. They began as childhood puzzles about motion, appearance, awareness, and existence.

01

The lamppost and the clouds

Why did the lamppost seem to fall when the clouds moved behind it?

First-person image of lying in the grass and looking up at a lamppost against moving clouds.
02

Dizzy Dizzy

Why did I still feel motion after I had stopped spinning?

First-person image of spinning dizziness on a village green.
03

The existence question

Why does any of this exist at all?

First-person image of lying under a vast sky and wondering why anything exists at all.

Across my empirical and theoretical work, I return to a small set of connected questions about how conscious experience is constructed.

01

Attention and awareness

When does sensory information become consciously available?

02

Expectation Awareness

Can expectation generate conscious reports when an expected stimulus is absent?

03

Predictive construction

How do priors, precision, and action shape what a perceiver experiences?

04

Awareness-First Theory

What if awareness is the field in which bodies, minds, and worlds appear?

A visual overview of constructing experience.

These figures summarise the core idea running through my empirical and theoretical work: conscious perception is constructed through the interaction of ambiguous sensory input, prior expectations, prediction errors, and attentional precision.

Ambiguous sensory input and ongoing inference figure
1. Ambiguous input. Sensory input is noisy and incomplete. The brain must infer the hidden causes of what it receives.
Hierarchical prediction error minimisation figure
2. Predictive inference. Perception is shaped by top-down predictions, bottom-up prediction errors, and precision weighting.
Constructing Experience framework overview
3. Constructing experience. Prior expectations and sensory evidence interact within a hierarchical predictive-processing system. Attention modulates precision, shaping the influence of prediction errors on conscious perception. When sensory precision is low, strong expectations may dominate experience.

Empirical work on attention, expectation, and the construction of experience.

Using behavioural, psychophysical, and EEG/ERP-informed methods, I investigate how attentional selection, prior expectation, sensory evidence, scene meaning, temporal perception, and conscious report interact in the construction of experience.

01

Attention and conscious access

Inattentional blindness, change blindness, iconic memory, and scene awareness

Studies examining what becomes conscious when attention is occupied or diverted, including work on natural scenes, objects, semantic incongruity, visual awareness, and iconic memory.

02

Expectation Awareness

Absent but expected stimuli under conditions of inattention

A sequence of experiments testing whether observers report consciously experiencing expected stimuli that are absent on critical trials, including letters, colour patches, faces, sounds, and touch.

03

Time and physical expectation

Duration perception, entropy, optic flow, visual acceleration, and visual gravity

Research on how violations of expected structure and physical regularities influence perceived duration and the organisation of perceptual experience.

Theoretical work linking perception science, active inference, and awareness.

In my theoretical work, I use these empirical findings on attention and expectation to address broader questions about predictive processing, active inference, the Free Energy Principle, and the ontological status of awareness.

Predictive processing

Perception is understood as precision-weighted inference. Attention changes the influence of sensory evidence; expectation constrains what is likely to appear.

  • Attention as precision
  • Expectation as prior constraint
  • Perception as active construction

Awareness-First Theory

AFT asks whether awareness is not produced inside a mindless physical universe, but is the field within which bodies, worlds, measurements, and explanations appear.

The question is not only how consciousness emerges, but how a world appears at all.

Essays on Perception, Consciousness, and Reality.

These short public-facing essays explore how experience is constructed. They begin with ordinary moments — seeing colour, motion, depth, objects, faces, shadows, and changes — and use them as gateways into perception science, cognitive neuroscience, predictive processing, and philosophy.

This section is conceived as an accessible series for students, teachers, young readers, and curious adults. The essays are connected to my scientific and philosophical work, but are written as invitations into the questions rather than as peer-reviewed research articles.

Featured essay

The Night the Earth Moved

Perception, frames, and the construction of reality: a reflective essay on how a shift in reference frame can transform the experienced world, from the movement of the Milky Way to the deeper question of how perception constructs reality.

Perception essays

From ordinary experience to perceptual science

Essays that begin with lived experience and ask what science reveals about how a world is visually and phenomenologically constructed.

Philosophy essays

Perception, reality, and the problem of consciousness

Essays that connect perceptual experience to larger philosophical questions about mind, world, appearance, and what science leaves out when it abstracts from lived experience.

Companion essays

Short pieces linked to the demonstrations

Brief essays designed to accompany the interactive demonstrations on the site, linking direct experience with explanation and reflection.

  • Why Does the Necker Cube Flip?
  • Why Do We Miss Big Changes?
  • Why Can Motion Be Seen Where Nothing Moves?
  • Why Does Context Change What We See?
  • What Does the Inverse Problem Show Us?

Interactive demonstrations.

These browser-based demonstrations are designed for teaching, talks, open days, and public engagement. They invite visitors to try short perceptual tasks and then reflect on what the task reveals about attention, expectation, prediction, and conscious experience. They are not formal experiments or validated measures of individual performance.

I will add further demonstrations here as they are developed.

Visual attention task

A short continuous scene demonstration

Try a brief visual task in which you watch a scene and keep track of a simple event. After you respond, the demonstration gives feedback and explains what the task can show about human perception.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Visual pattern task

A brief expectation-based perception demonstration

Try a short visual task involving rapid pattern judgements and a final report. After you respond, the demonstration gives feedback and explains the logic of the task.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Object in context task

A short visual interpretation demonstration

Try a brief task in which you describe an object as it appears in different visual scenes. After you respond, the demonstration gives feedback and explains what the task can show about visual interpretation.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Motion from flashes

A brief apparent-motion demonstration

Try a simple display in which two visual events alternate in time. After you respond, the demonstration explains what the task can show about perceived motion.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

After the Spin

A motion-aftereffect demonstration

Watch a rotating pattern, then look at a still village-green scene. After you respond, the demonstration explains how motion can briefly appear to persist after physical motion has stopped.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Ambiguous cube task

A reversible-figure demonstration

View a classic line drawing and track how its apparent depth changes over time. After you respond, the demonstration offers a short explanation of what the display can show about visual organisation and conscious experience.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

The Windowless Room

A Bayesian inference and inverse-problem demonstration

Step through a guided demonstration in which a being inside a sealed room hears an ambiguous sound and must infer its hidden cause. Explore how changing priors changes the posterior even when the sensory evidence stays the same.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

The Submarine

An active inference and Markov blanket demonstration

Enter a guided underwater demonstration in which a submarine receives ambiguous sensory signals, updates beliefs about hidden causes, and then acts to reduce uncertainty and remain in viable states.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Optic flow and duration task

A short motion and time-perception demonstration

Try a brief visual motion task involving optic-flow displays and duration judgements. After you respond, the demonstration explains the logic of the task.

Open demo Teaching demonstration · opens in a new tab

Doctoral research supervision.

My current doctoral students are extending the expectation-awareness and perceptual-expectation research programmes across sensory modalities, neural measures, and perceived time.

01

Expectation awareness and neural signatures

Expected absent faces, inattention, and face-sensitive processing

Doctoral work extending absent-face expectation experiments and examining evidence relevant to neural signatures of face-sensitive processing under expectation and inattention.

02

Auditory expectation awareness

Perceiving the absent in audition

Doctoral research testing whether expected but absent auditory events can be consciously reported under conditions of inattention.

03

Haptic expectation awareness

Expectation, touch, and bodily perception

Doctoral research extending the logic of expectation-driven conscious reports into tactile and bodily perception.

04

Visual acceleration and perceived duration

Optic flow, visual gravity, and time perception

Doctoral research examining how visual acceleration, optic flow, and gravity-like motion cues influence perceived duration and the organisation of perceptual experience.

Constructing Experience.

My Cambridge Element develops the central argument that conscious perception is shaped by attention, expectation, prediction, and inference.

Cover of Constructing Experience by Jason Clarke
Cambridge Elements in Perception

Constructing Experience: Expectation and Attention in Perception

The book brings together work on inattentional blindness, iconic memory, expectation, predictive processing, and conscious perception to ask how experience is constructed.

Media and interviews.

The Dissenter · Episode #1199

Constructing Experience: Expectation and Attention in Perception

A conversation about the brain as a predictive, generative system: how attention selects and weights sensory evidence, how expectations shape perceptual reality, and why expected but absent stimuli can sometimes be reported under conditions of inattention. The discussion also considers consciousness, the explanatory gap, controlled hallucination, and the clinical and theoretical implications of expectation-driven experience.

Publications and conference presentations.

Selected books, peer-reviewed articles, published abstracts, and conference presentations on attention, expectation, conscious perception, predictive processing, time perception, and Awareness-First Theory.

Book

2025

Clarke, J. Constructing Experience: Expectation and Attention in Perception.

Cambridge University Press, Elements in Perception.

doi.org/10.1017/9781009588577
Book

Peer-reviewed publications

2026

Clarke, J. The Awareness-First Theory: A coherence principle underlying active inference and physical law.

Entropy, 28(3), 306. Published in the Special Issue: Active Inference in Cognitive Neuroscience.

doi.org/10.3390/e28030306
Journal article
2024

Clarke, J., & Tyler, B. Expecting the future: Entropy-based predictions in time perception.

Timing & Time Perception.

doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10105
Journal article
2020

Porubanova, M., Clarke, J., Erol, M., & Priefer, R. Prioritisation and interference of emotional information in briefly presented scenes: Selection advantage for positive emotional scenes.

Studia Psychologica, 62(4), 335–349.

doi.org/10.31577/sp.2020.04.808
Journal article
2020

Clarke, J., & Porubanova, M. Scene and object violations cause subjective time dilation.

Timing & Time Perception, 8(3–4), 279–298.

doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10012
Journal article
2018

Webster, A., Clarke, J., Ro, T., & Mack, A. Effects of canonical colour, luminance, and orientation on sustained inattentional blindness for natural scenes.

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1833–1846.

doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1558-z
Journal article
2018

Mack, A., Clarke, J., & Erol, M. Attention, expectation, and iconic memory: A reply to Aru and Bachmann (2017).

Consciousness and Cognition, 59, 60–63.

doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.001
Journal article
2017

Mack, A., Erol, M., & Clarke, J. When expectation confounds iconic memory: A reply to Bachmann and Aru (2016).

Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 363–364.

doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.004
Journal article
2015

Clarke, J., & Mack, A. Iconic memory for natural scenes: Evidence using a modified change-detection procedure.

Visual Cognition, 23(7), 917–938.

doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1103826
Journal article
2015

Mack, A., Erol, M., & Clarke, J. Iconic memory is not a case of attention-free awareness.

Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 291–299.

doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.016
Journal article

Conference presentations and published abstracts

2026

Gerstmayer, G., & Clarke, J. Attention modulates duration perception for accelerating but not uniform motion.

European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), Bournemouth, UK.

Poster, forthcoming
2026

Verbickas, A., & Clarke, J. Perceiving the absent: Auditory expectations generate illusory percepts under inattention.

Auditory Science Meeting, Manchester, UK.

Poster, forthcoming
2025

Gerstmayer, G., & Clarke, J. Subjective time dilation in optic flow: Effects of visual gravity and motion speed on duration estimation.

European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), Mainz, Germany.

doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27732.46726
Poster
2025

Tyler, B., Clarke, J., & Silas, J. Is attention necessary for non-perceptual conscious experiences? An event-related potential analysis of expectation awareness.

British Neuroscience Association International Festival of Neuroscience, Liverpool, UK.

Poster
2021

Clarke, J., Porubanova, M., Mazzoli, A., & Kut, G. Perception of time’s arrow and entropy: Violations to the second law of thermodynamics disrupt time perception.

European Conference on Visual Perception.

Poster
2018

Clarke, J., Kuvaldina, M., & Mack, A. Frames of reference determine the direction of the motion aftereffect (MAE): Evidence supporting the influence of perceived motion in the MAE.

Vision Sciences Society Annual Conference, Florida, USA.

Poster
2018

Erol, M., Mack, A., & Clarke, J. Expectation blindness: Seeing a face when there is none.

Journal of Vision, 18(10), 1115.

doi.org/10.1167/18.10.1115
Published abstract
2017

Porubanova, M., Kuvaldina, M., Clarke, J., & Erol, M. Emotional inattentional blindness effect.

OPAM: Object Perception, Visual Attention, and Visual Memory, Vancouver, Canada.

Poster
2017

Porubanova, M., Brocker, D., Geiger, E., Clarke, J., Erol, M., & Mack, A. Directed inhibition of emotional scenes in iconic memory: Interference of positive information.

Perception 46 ECVP Abstract; European Conference on Visual Perception, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract
2016

Erol, M., Mack, A., Clarke, J., & Bert, J. Inattentional blindness to absent stimuli: The role of expectation.

Journal of Vision, 16(12), 40.

doi.org/10.1167/16.12.40
Published abstract
2015

Clarke, J., & Mack, A. Evidence for iconic memory of natural scenes before change blindness.

Journal of Vision, 15(12), 348.

doi.org/10.1167/15.12.348
Published abstract
2015

Holder, L., Erol, M., Mack, A., Bert, J., & Clarke, J. Action video game playing does not reduce inattentional blindness.

Journal of Vision, 15(12), 441.

doi.org/10.1167/15.12.441
Published abstract
2014

Webster, K., Clarke, J., Mack, A., & Ro, T. Appropriately coloured scenes reduce inattentional blindness.

Journal of Vision, 14(10), 609.

doi.org/10.1167/14.10.609
Published abstract
2013

Clarke, J., Ro, T., & Mack, A. The persistence of inattentional blindness and the absence of priming from natural scenes.

Journal of Vision, 13(9), 1136.

doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1136
Published abstract
2011

Clarke, J., Mack, A., Kuvaldina, M., Slesar, C., & Erol, M. No gist perception without attention.

Journal of Vision, 11(11), 156.

doi.org/10.1167/11.11.156
Published abstract
2011

Slesar, C., Mack, A., Clarke, J., & Erol, M. Two object subliminal priming.

Journal of Vision, 11(11), 1280.

doi.org/10.1167/11.11.1280
Published abstract

Contact and academic profiles.

I am open to conversations about research collaboration, doctoral supervision, media enquiries, talks, and work relating to attention, expectation, prediction, perception, consciousness, active inference, and Awareness-First Theory.